Small and decentralized is beautiful. Sometimes big is necessary. This has become my mantra of late (as some of you may know). This is especially when it comes to infrastructure. Bucky Fuller noted that Nature’s design strategy suggests that Universe is populated with many, many small ubiquitous “events” punctuated with large events which occur with much less frequency in comparison. But exist they do.
Ecologist Paul Colinvaux echoed this theme in a book entitled “Why Big Fierce Animals Are Rare”. Although his book is really an excellent overview of ecology, it does touch on the notion of bigness. (Think about the number of beetles and ants compared to the number of bears and whales). He even goes so far as to speculate that perhaps the T-Rex never existed in the form of a ferocious, meat-eating hunter as popularly portrayed.
When it comes to human design, big seems to be OK if it’s “out of sight”. Of course, “somewhere else” eventually becomes somewhere and that somewhere – more often than not – can be seen by someone.
It will be an interesting test to see if President Obama can bring the country together on difficult issues such as this. (GW)
Obama's high-wire electric act
Will he take the people's land to build a national grid when local networks for energy renewables may do?
Christian Science Monitor| Editorial
January 28, 2009
To justify taking homes and farms to build the Interstate highway, President Eisenhower cited a security need: Military vehicles must move fast in case of war. Now President Obama, citing a need to curb global warming, wants new transmission lines across
The question hangs like a sparking high-tension wire over Mr. Obama's plans to plow $11 billion – part of his economic stimulus – into a "smart grid," which is critical to his ambitious goal to curb fossil fuel use by 2020.
Even without a need to help renewables transmit electrons, the nation's electric grid needs an upgrade. Its structure hasn't changed much from the days of Thomas Edison. Blackouts, such as the big one in 2003 that left 50 million people in the dark, are increasing. Its 164,000 miles of lines and 9,200 generating plants are ill-equipped to accept power from small-scale sources such as wind, geothermal, and biomass.
Yet Obama wants to double renewable energy within three years and bring it "to every corner of our nation." Without smashing through local resistance and environmental concerns to new transmission lines, he's unlikely to reach his goal.
One problem is that the best sites for renewables are generally not near major cities. Sun is plentiful in the Southwest and wind in the
In 2005, a new federal statute authorized the Energy secretary to designate National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors while also allowing the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to use eminent domain to build new lines. Both provisions have drawn fierce opposition, especially in
The Obama team is slowly trying to make a compelling legal case for stronger federal powers. One think tank aligned with the new president, the Center for American Progress, claims "
One problem with this approach is that it is too national and potentially Big Brotherish in its methods, while most of the action so far on renewables is local and needs only local connections to utilities.
What's needed are "microgrids," or small-scale electricity distribution systems with many sources and local storage – much like the Internet – with a centralized long-distance system only as backup. Thousands of buildings now generate much of their electricity from rooftop solar panels, for example.
Before Obama starts forcing people off their land for a worthy global cause, he should first think local. Many people – and states – are already ahead of him.