Watch your HFC's

If there's one thing you can definitely count on in this world it's unintended consequences. They always crop up. In fact, I would offer that even the most comprehensive and well designed solutions bring unintended consequences with them. However, just because they are unplanned does not necessarily mean they are bad or unwanted.

Hydrofluorocarbons were hailed as an environmental saviour when they were proposed as a substitute for ozone-depleting Chlorofluorocarbons in a variety of applications. Alas, while HFC's are kind to the ozone layer, they do trap heat and contribute to global climate change. Make no mistake, this is an example of an unwanted unintended consequence. I'll provide examples of beneficial unintended (or unanticipated consequences) in future posts. (GW)

Beyond CO2: Growing Importance of HFCs In Climate Warming

The Chief Engineer
August 2, 2009

Some of the substances that are helping to avert the destruction of the ozone layer could increasingly contribute to climate warming, according to scientists from NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory and their colleagues in a new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

The author took a fresh look at how the global use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is expected to grow in coming decades. Using updated usage estimates and looking farther ahead than past projections (to the year 2050), they found that HFCs - especially from developing countries - will become an increasingly larger factor in future climate warming.

“ HFCs are good for protecting the ozone layer, but they are not climate friendly,” said David W. Fahey, a scientist at NOAA and second author of the new study. “Our research shows that their effect on climate could become significantly larger than we expected, if we continue along a business-as-usual path.”

HFCs currently have a climate change contribution that is small (less than 1 percent) in comparison to the contribution of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The authors have shown that by 2050 the HFCs contribution could rise to 7 to 12 percent of what CO2 contributes. And if international efforts succeed in stabilizing CO2 emissions, the relative climate contribution from HFCs would increase further.

Under current regulations, the demand for HFCs is expected to increase globally. HFCs, which do not contain ozone-destroying chlorine or bromine atoms, are used as substitutes for ozone-depleting compounds such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in such uses as refrigeration, air conditioning, and the production of insulating foams. The Montreal Protocol, a 1987 international agreement, has gradually phased out the use of CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances, leading to the development of long-term replacements such as HFCs.

Though the HFCs do not deplete the ozone layer, they are potent greenhouse gases. Molecule for molecule, all HFCs are more potent warming agents than CO2 and some are thousands of times more effective. HFCs are in the “basket of gases” regulated under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.

The new study factored in the expected growth in demand for air conditioning, refrigerants, and other technology in developed and developing countries. The Montreal Protocol’s gradual phasing out of the consumption of ozone-depleting substances in developing countries after 2012, along with the complete phase-out in developed countries in 2020, are other factors that will lead to increased usage of HFCs and other alternatives.

Decision-makers in Europe and the United States have begun to consider possible steps to limit the potential climate consequences of HFCs. The PNAS study examined several hypothetical scenarios to mitigate HFC consumption. For example, a global consumption limit followed by a four percent annual reduction would cause HFC-induced climate forcing to peak in the year 2040 and then begin to decrease before the year 2050.

“ While unrestrained growth of HFC use could lead to significant climate implications by 2050, we have shown some examples of global limits that can effectively reduce the HFCs’ impact, said John S. Daniel, a NOAA coauthor of the study.

The authors of the PNAS study, “The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing,” are Guus J.M Velders of the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Fahey and Daniel of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory, Mack McFarland of DuPont Fluoroproducts, and Stephen O. Andersen of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

NOAA understands and predicts changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and conserves and manages our coastal and marine resources.